![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
THE 50PLUS BEST PRACTICES SERIESManaging Online Surveys©Volume 3 Table of Contents
IntroductionThe impact of online survey technology on the market research world is an old story. Everyone knows the value and benefits of online quantitative research. But while the online survey technology looks seductively simple, many have found the management of online research surprisingly difficult. This is especially true in B2B research where sample costs are high and finding the right respondents can be tremendously difficult. This Best Practices whitepaper is meant to provide professional researchers, or clients conducting research on their own, with a few “tips” that can help them avoid some common online research problems and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their current research processes. The Value of a Pre-testAn ounce of prevention Surprisingly, the majority of online surveys are sent into the field without a pre-test. While researchers know that a pre-test is a good idea, they often succumb to client pressures and the fear that there is:
In reality, no one has ever regretted running a pre-test. One extra day and a few hundred dollars will save you thousands of dollars and weeks of wasted effort. A pre-test is a hundred times better than sending the link out to your colleagues or clients asking them to help “check the survey”. The key benefits of the pre-test include:
In some cases, you may only have a limited number of names, and don’t want to “waste” them in a pre-test. In these cases, simply buy some inexpensive names from your supplier. While you can’t use their data, they’ll work perfectly to test the survey programming. Monitoring Data QualityA few numbers that will save your life Any good online survey provider, or survey software, will have a comprehensive set of online reporting tools. These tools give you real-time access to important metrics that serve as an early warning system for problems that can ruin the best data collection plan. Click Through RateTrack the percentage of people who open your survey invitation. If the “click through rate” is lower than your expectations (or the norms your online provider typically achieves), it means you have to re-work the invitation. Some of the first changes you might try are:
Drop OutsLook for questions that have a high drop out rate. A single question can dramatically reduce your number of completed questionnaires and significantly raise your costs. Ways to make these questions less demanding include:
Total Completion RateIf your total completion rate is low, but no individual question has a very high dropout rate, it may mean that the overall survey is too long. Cut out a few questions or consider removing a few variables from any large grids. Constructing an Effective InvitationClarity – but with a little sizzle The invitation to take your survey is one of the key factors in determining your participation rate. Small changes in the text can result in big changes in participation rates. And, moving from a 4% to a 5% participation rate increases the number of respondents by 25%. Some guidelines to remember in writing an invitation:
Using an IncentiveA few dollars go a long way The desire to save a few dollars often leads companies to run the survey without an incentive. This is almost always counter productive. Even a small incentive substantially lifts your participation and yields higher completion rates. This helps insure that you have high quality participants who value their own time. Sometimes clients will be afraid that they are “Bribing” the respondents. The incentive is not a bribe. Incentives:
Incentives are typically very small expenses within the total cost of the project. We often use a drawing for one of five $200 gift certificates on Amazon.com. Leveraging Online TechnologyDon’t shoot for the lowest common denominator One of the great things about online surveys is the technology that you can embed within the survey itself. You can show movies, demonstrate products, or explore a competitor’s website. At the same time, it is important to take the respondents’ technological sophistication and computer systems into account. Often, out of fear, researchers like to “dumb down” the survey so that every web browser and dial-up user can see it. But that is typically an over-reaction. Imagine your core target, and use a level of technology that is appropriate to that target. True, you may lose a few technology laggards, but you’ll more than make up for it by having a dynamic survey that engages your participants and results in higher completion rates. At the same time, recognize that the more technology you pack into the survey, the greater the number of respondents who will have some technology problem. Completing your survey is not your respondent’s first priority. It is unreasonable to expect a respondent to go to the trouble of loading the latest Flash Player or re-setting their monitor’s resolution in the middle of a survey. They’re much more likely to just go back to reading their email. Research not SpamPart of the problem or part of the solution? Just as unlisted numbers and hang-up rates have changed the economics of telephone surveys, spam poses a danger to the legitimacy of online research. In today’s spam filled world – every researcher wonders:
The best way to fight spam is to make sure that you are responsible in your use of email lists. The two primary rules are:
»View the PDF file of this document. Contents are the property of: |
||
| Copyright © 2007, 50Plus Market Research, All Rights Reserved | ||